Development of the American commercial space industry: imminent federal decisions and implications for economic development in the states

As he prepares his 2010 state of the state and FY 2011 budget messages, President Obama is widely said to be leaning toward outsourcing to commercial firms some of NASA’s mid-term launch operations (such as resupply of the International Space Station, or even other exploratory ventures).

For intelligent discussion of the options the President has been exploring since late 2009, see the report of the Augustine Commission (formally known as the Review of Human Spaceflight Plans Committee). While not as cheap as the “base case” in-house programs, commercial operations stand a better chance of actually achieving interesting goals and inspiring ordinary Americans, so look for them in these documents, I’d say. I’ll update this post when we know if I’m right. UPDATE (1/24/10): WSJ says it’s going to happen.

A decision to go commercial would mean canceling or scaling back dramatically in-house development programs like the Ares I rocket, and that’s bad news for states that host associated NASA Centers or NASA’s prime contractors that tend to hang their hats nearby. UPDATE 2 (2/1/10): Yep, it’s official. From NASA budget press conference: Ares canceled. Still pretty modest expenditures on commercial launches but realistically now there’s no alternative for low earth orbit.

However, it could be good news for those states where the new generation of new and nimble commercial operators intend to exploit the “airmail” or “internet” models under which government contracts build an entirely new technology-based industry aimed at commercial customers.

Make no mistake. This shift to commercial is already under way. There are new players of some scale like Orbital, SpaceX, Virgin Galactic, and many, many smaller ventures. In fact, even the primes have mobilized through joint ventures like United Launch Alliance and individually to capture this business in the event they are no longer working directly on NASA programs, but instead for NASA to deliver payloads to orbit. There’s a big difference, but either way they intend to profit.

Commercial space firms and their suppliers (many indistinguishable from “ordinary” high-tech businesses) do not necessarily nest in the traditional places. According to the FAA’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (summary map and excellent full report), there are seven “federal” spaceports (that is, under either military or NASA control) around the nation; another seven already-licensed “non-federal” spaceports (sponsored mainly by state-chartered aerospace development authorities); and another eight “proposed” spaceports of diverse type.

The table below summarizes these data, noting the broad mandates of these space authorities to develop comprehensive aerospace sectors, including enabling technologies of all types. The table also lists states with NASA Centers and their expertises, some but not all of which will be salient to Augustine’s call for enhanced attention to “technology development” necessary to meet long-term, inspirational space goals.

A shift to commercial operations for near-term launch capacity would not necessarily affect NASA’s later-stage plans for heavy-lift vehicles, but once you unleash the forces of capitalism it’s very hard to say where things will end up.

It’s very early to have much certainty, but I’d say that a shift in federal policy toward commercial operation presages a subtle but notable shift in the center of gravity of the American space program from the South/Southeast to the Far West and Southwest, with lots of interesting economic-development consequences. What do you say?

StateFederal spaceportNon-federal spaceportSpaceport authorityNon-spaceport NASA assetComment
AlabamaNASA Marshall Space Flight Center at the Army Redstone ArsenalSpace systems and hardware; adjacent to major aerospace research park
AlabamaSpaceport Alabama (proposed)Spaceport Alabama Office at Jacksonville State University
AlaskaKodiak Launch ComplexAlaska Aerospace CorporationMandate to develop "more than space launch"
CaliforniaEdwards AFBAlternate shuttle landing site
CaliforniaVandenberg AFBMilitary missile range; launch presence by SpaceX, Orbital Sciences, and ULA (Boeing/Lockheed JV)
CaliforniaCalifornia Space Centerat VandenbergCalifornia Space AuthorityBroad mandate for development of "the space enterprise" including multiple spaceports
CaliforniaMojave Spaceport near Edwards
CaliforniaNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory at CaltechRobotic space exploration
CaliforniaNASA Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards AFBAtmospheric flight research and operations
CaliforniaNASA AmesSpace IT, based in Silicon Valley
FloridaNASA Kennedy Space Centerhuttle and ISS launch services; ; launch presence by SpaceX and ULA (Boeing/Lockheed JV)
FloridaCape Canaveral AF Station at Patrick AFBMilitary
FloridaCape Canaveral Spaceport (proposed)Space FloridaBroad mandate for "next generation of space industry businesses"; adjacent research parkand facilities
FloridaCecil Field Spaceport (proposed)Jacksonville Aviation Authority
Marshall IslandsReagan Test SiteMilitary missile range; launch presence by SpaceX
MarylandNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterDevelopment of unmanned science spacecraft
MississippiNASA Stennis Space CenterRocket engine test complex
New MexicoWhite Sands Missile RangeMilitary missile range
New MexicoSpaceport America (near White Sands)Spaceport AmericaBroad mandate to develop "the future space industry"; presence by Virgin Galactic, UP Aerospace, X PRIZE Foundation, Lockheed Martin, Payload Specialties, and Microgravity Enterprises
OffshoreSea Launch PlatformHomeport in Long Beach, CA
OhioNASA Glenn Research CenterAeronautics, power systems, propulsion
OklahomaOklahoma SpaceportOklahoma Space Industry Development AuthorityFocus on testbed for reusable launch vehicle technology
TexasWest Texas Spaceport (proposed)Pecos County/West Texas Spaceport Development Corporation
TexasBlue Origin
TexasSouth Texas Spaceport
TexasNASA Johnson Space CenterMission control, astronaut corps, shuttle, ISS ops
VirginiaWallops Flight FacilitySuborbital research programs
VirginiaMid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport at WallopsVirginia Commercial Spaceflight Authority
VirginiaNASA Langley Research CenterSpace-based earth science
WashingtonSpaceport Washington (proposed)Port of Moses LakePrivate development
WisconsinSpaceport Sheboygan (proposed)City of Sheboygan, Wisconsin
WyomingChugwater Spaceport (proposed)

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.