<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: My response to the White House RFI on commercialization of university technologies</title> <atom:link href="http://tbed.org/2010/my-response-to-the-white-house-rfi-on-commercialization-of-university-technologies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://tbed.org/2010/my-response-to-the-white-house-rfi-on-commercialization-of-university-technologies/</link> <description>Projects, resources, and commentary by David Hochman</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:38:32 -0500</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Tweets that mention My response to the White House RFI on commercialization of university technologies -- Topsy.com</title><link>http://tbed.org/2010/my-response-to-the-white-house-rfi-on-commercialization-of-university-technologies/#comment-7486</link> <dc:creator>Tweets that mention My response to the White House RFI on commercialization of university technologies -- Topsy.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:05:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbed.org/?p=411#comment-7486</guid> <description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by dhochman. dhochman said: @whitehouse extends deadline on #commercialization RFI http://bit.ly/cSxdME read mine here http://bit.ly/dsT5lJ or here http://bit.ly/cmbh6o [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by dhochman. dhochman said: @whitehouse extends deadline on #commercialization RFI <a href="http://bit.ly/cSxdME" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cSxdME</a> read mine here <a href="http://bit.ly/dsT5lJ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dsT5lJ</a> or here <a href="http://bit.ly/cmbh6o" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cmbh6o</a> [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Riccardo Cannaviello</title><link>http://tbed.org/2010/my-response-to-the-white-house-rfi-on-commercialization-of-university-technologies/#comment-7485</link> <dc:creator>Riccardo Cannaviello</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:38:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbed.org/?p=411#comment-7485</guid> <description>Thank you for this good letter, filled with thoughtful context. I would tend to favor an alternative solution. Based on direct experience, POCCs aren&#039;t the answer if they&#039;re staffed by low-wattage program administration types who survive by &quot;educating faculty members on how to become entrepreneurs&quot; as you perfectly put it. Without naming names, let&#039;s just say I&#039;ve lived and worked in San Diego and in Los Angeles, and I&#039;ve yet to see a POCC that works.My alternative proposal is this: let the funding agencies increase the average SBIR dollar amount, while requiring that the extra money be spent on professional-grade commercialization.By encouraging commercialization to become decentralized, we would deliberately undergo a messy stage of fragmentation.Eventually, the commercialization industry should consolidate around successful commercialization practitioners identifiable by their RESULTS, rather than self-preserving POCC bureaucracies.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this good letter, filled with thoughtful context. I would tend to favor an alternative solution. Based on direct experience, POCCs aren&#8217;t the answer if they&#8217;re staffed by low-wattage program administration types who survive by &#8220;educating faculty members on how to become entrepreneurs&#8221; as you perfectly put it. Without naming names, let&#8217;s just say I&#8217;ve lived and worked in San Diego and in Los Angeles, and I&#8217;ve yet to see a POCC that works.</p><p>My alternative proposal is this: let the funding agencies increase the average SBIR dollar amount, while requiring that the extra money be spent on professional-grade commercialization.</p><p>By encouraging commercialization to become decentralized, we would deliberately undergo a messy stage of fragmentation.</p><p>Eventually, the commercialization industry should consolidate around successful commercialization practitioners identifiable by their RESULTS, rather than self-preserving POCC bureaucracies.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: tbed.org @ 2012-05-19 02:31:45 -->
