http://tbed.org/2008/bayh-dole-again/ Projects, resources, and commentary by David Hochman Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:38:32 -0500 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://tbed.org/2008/bayh-dole-again/#comment-7470 Quick take: Kauffman on Bayh-Dole Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:37:10 +0000 http://tbed.org/?p=91#comment-7470 [...] Bayh-Dole, which — whatever the deficiencies of university TTOs, and I concede many — has been reasonably successful as overall federal policy. I’m going to think about this, but I definitely have some [...] [...] Bayh-Dole, which — whatever the deficiencies of university TTOs, and I concede many — has been reasonably successful as overall federal policy. I’m going to think about this, but I definitely have some [...]

]]> http://tbed.org/2008/bayh-dole-again/#comment-7452 » Some observations on the Obama science team, and what to watch for Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:02:50 +0000 http://tbed.org/?p=91#comment-7452 [...] Project. Both men have experience with the commercialization of federally funded science under the Bayh-Dole Act, at the scale of both the large-company licensee and the venture-capital-backed startup. However, [...] [...] Project. Both men have experience with the commercialization of federally funded science under the Bayh-Dole Act, at the scale of both the large-company licensee and the venture-capital-backed startup. However, [...]

]]> http://tbed.org/2008/bayh-dole-again/#comment-7451 When Academia Puts Profit Ahead of Wonder :: Kumaramangalam Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:59:13 +0000 http://tbed.org/?p=91#comment-7451 [...] and a rebuttal. [...] [...] and a rebuttal. [...]

]]> http://tbed.org/2008/bayh-dole-again/#comment-7445 Colleen Gibney Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:29:26 +0000 http://tbed.org/?p=91#comment-7445 David, I agree with you on the spin vs. the facts on Bayh-Dole, and how stand-alone science-for-hire from universities has been affected also. The IP quandary you mention, which can be separated from Bayh-Dole itself, is part of why non-US universities become attractive for sponsored research, but it is not the full story. There is an international market for this type of research, and US institutions have largely acted conservatively when it comes to competing in this market. There is more of an ambivalence about participating in private sector wealth-creation on US campuses than in those of nations that have made a greater commitment to sustaining a national innovation infrastructure. David, I agree with you on the spin vs. the facts on Bayh-Dole, and how stand-alone science-for-hire from universities has been affected also. The IP quandary you mention, which can be separated from Bayh-Dole itself, is part of why non-US universities become attractive for sponsored research, but it is not the full story. There is an international market for this type of research, and US institutions have largely acted conservatively when it comes to competing in this market. There is more of an ambivalence about participating in private sector wealth-creation on US campuses than in those of nations that have made a greater commitment to sustaining a national innovation infrastructure.

]]>